A OCDE e a política global de educação o PISA como “big science”
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Vulgarizado, em 1961, nos Estados Unidos da América (EUA), o conceito de “big science” refere-se à investigação científica em grande escala, com orçamentos importantes, equipas numerosas, instrumentos e laboratórios de grandes dimensões, com produção de uma enorme quantidade de dados, embora muitas vezes com relevância diminuta. O artigo analisa de que forma o Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), levado a cabo pela Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Económico (OCDE), se pode inserir nesta categoria de “big science”. Os resultados encontrados apontam para que o PISA possa ser considerado o primeiro programa que se insere nesta forma de fazer ciência.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
Referências
Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzi, W. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: a review and synthesis. Journal Telematics and Informatics, 37, 13-49.
Baneke, D. (2020). Let’s not talk about science: the normalization of big science and the moral economy of modern astronomy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(1), 164-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919846600
Baradwaj, B., & Pal, S. (2011). Mining Educational Data to Analyze Students’ Performance. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 6(2), 63-69.
Bastin, G., & Tubaro, P. (2018). Le moment big data des sciences sociales. Presses de Sciences Po – Revue française de sociologie, 59, 375-394.
Baudrillard, J. (1970), La société de consommation : ses mythes, ses structures. S.G.PP.
Ben Kei, D. (2019). Big Data and data science: critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101-113.
Bourn, J. (2007). Big Science: Public investment in large scientific facilities. National Audit Office.
Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: an exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD Publications.
Charbonnier, E., & Gouëdard (2020). Les réformes à l’horizon 2030 dans les pays de l’OCDE. Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres, 83, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.4000/ries.9382
De Ketele, J.-M., & Roegiers, X. (1993). Metodologia da recolha de dados: fundamentos dos métodos de observações, de questionários, de entrevistas e de estudos de documentos (trad.: Carlos Aboim de Brito). Instituto Piaget.
Domingos, F. (Coord.), Neves, C., Tinoca, L., Viseu, S., & Henriques, S. (2018). Políticas educativas e desempenho de Portugal no PISA (2000-2015). Instituto de Educação.
Ducret, A. (2021). Le concept de « configuration » et ses implications empiriques : Elias avec et contre Weber. SociologieS [en ligne], La recherche en actes. https://doi.org/10.4000/sociologies.3459
Echeverría, J. (2003). La revolución tecnocientífica. Fondo de Cultura Económica de España.
Elias, N. (1993). Qu’est-ce que la sociologie?. Agora Pocket.
Felouzis, G., & Hanhart, S. (dir.) (2011). Gouverner l’éducation par les nombres ? Usages, débats et controverses. De Boeck.
Galison, P., & Hevly, B. (1992). Big science: the growth of large-scale research. Stanford University Press.
Gastro, M., & Oppelt, T. (2018). Big science and human development – what is the connection?. South African Journal of Science, 114 (11/12). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/5182
Gorur, R., Sellar, S., & Steiner-Khamsi. G. (2019). Big data and even bigger consequences. In R. Gorur, S. Sellar, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (eds.), Comparative methodology in the era of big data and global networks (pp. 1-9). Routledge.
Hallonsten, O. (2016). Big Science transformed: science, politics and organization in Europe and the United States. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jacob, M., & Hallonsten, O. (2012). The persistence of big science and megascience in research and innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 39(4), 411-415.
Jakupec, V., & Meier, B. (2015). PISA-shock, after shocks and misconceptions. Leibniz Online, 17, 1-11.
Josephson, P., & Klanovicz, J. (2018). Big Science e Tecnologia no século XX. Fronteiras: Revista Catarinense de História, 27, 149-168. https://doi.org/10.36661/2238-9717.2016n27.8051.
Lemos, V. (2014). A influência da OCDE nas políticas públicas de educação em Portugal. Almedina.
Lingard, B. (2016). PISA: Fundamentações para participar e acolhimento político. Educação & Sociedade, 136(37), 609-627.
Merton, R. (1938). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England. Saint Catherine Press.
Merton, R. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126.
Merton, R. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review, 22, 635-659.
Mons, N., & Pons, X. (2013). Pourquoi n’y a-t-il pas eu de « choc PISA » en France ? Sociologie de la réception d’une enquête internationale (2001-2008). Revues françaises de pédagogie, 182, 8-18.
Moreira, C. (1994). Planeamento e estratégias da investigação social. ISCSP.
Nóvoa, A. (Coord.) (1992). Os professores e a sua formação. Publicação Dom Quixote.
Nye, M. (1996). Before big science: the pursuit of modern chemistry and physics 1800-1840. Harvard University Press.
OCDE (2010), The high cost of low educational performance: the long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. OCDE Publications.
OCDE (2012). Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives: a strategic approach to skills policies. OCDE Publications.
OCDE (2013). PISA 2012 Results: excellence through equity: giving every student the chance to succeed, vol. I. OCDE Publications.
OCDE (2015). Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives: a strategic approach to education and skills policies for the United Arab Emirates. OCDE Publications.
OCDE (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving (revised edition). OECD Publishing.
OCDE (2018). Le futur de l’éducation et des compétences : Projet Éducation 2030 de l’OCDE. OCDE Publications.
Price, D. S. (1963). Little science, Big science… and Beyond. Columbia University Press.
Robertson, S. (2019). Comparing platforms and the new value economy in the academy”, in Radhika Gorur, Sam Sellar, & Gita Steiner-Khamsi (eds.), Comparative methodology in the era of big data and global networks (pp. 169-186). Routledge.
Rosa, V. (2020). A participação de Portugal no estudo ICILS. EDUSER: revista de educação, 12(2), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.34620/eduser.v12i2.144
Rosa, V. (2021). Avaliação em larga escala: a participação de Portugal no TIMSS, PIRLS e ICILS. EDUSER: revista de educação, 13(1), 23-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.34620/eduser.v13i1.148
Rosa, V., Maia, J., Mascarenhas, D., & Teodoro, A. (2020). PISA, TIMSS e PIRLS em Portugal: análise comparativa. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 33(1), 94-120. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.18380
Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class: How to build a 21st-century school system, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. OECD Publishing.
Sjøberg, S. (2017). PISA as a Challenge for Science Education: Inherent Problems and Problematic Results from a Global Assessment Regime. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências., 17(1), 327-363.
Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should Inquiry-Based Science Education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings?. NorDiNa - Nordic Studies in Science Education, 14(2), 186-202.
Teodoro, A. & Lopo, T. T. (2021). The OECD again: legitimization of a new vocationalism in the educational policies in Portugal (1979–1993). Paedagogica Historica. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2021.1941143
Teodoro, A. (2001). A construção política da educação: Estado, mudança social e políticas educativas no Portugal contemporâneo. Edições Afrontamento.
Teodoro, A. (2019). The end of isolationism: examining the OCDE influence in Portuguese education policies, 1955-1974. Paedagogica Historica: International Journal of the History of Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2019.1606022
Teodoro, A. (2020). Contesting the Global Development of Sustainable and Inclusive Education. Education Reform and the Challenges of Neoliberal Globalization. Routledge.
Tight, M. (2019). Documentary research in the social sciences. Sage Publications.
Turner, J. (2003). Little book, big book: before and after little science, big science: a review article, Part I. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 32(2), 115-125.
Weinberg, A. (1961). Impact of large-scale science on the United States. Science, 134, 161-164.
Williamson, B. (2017). Big Data in Education: the digital future of learning, policy and practice. Sage Publications.